Title : Why is U.S. not globally condemned for its military occupation of Syria?
link : Why is U.S. not globally condemned for its military occupation of Syria?
Why is U.S. not globally condemned for its military occupation of Syria?
| Washington's Blog | Feb 9, 2018 | Eric Zuesse |
 |
| © Sputnik News |
On February 8th, at the U.N., the Russian Government, through its U.N. Representative Vasily Nebenzia, said against the U.S. Government’s forces in Syria, “They are in fact illegally in Syria, nobody called them there, they constantly assert that they are fighting there against international terrorism, but we see that they go beyond this framework.”
No public response has yet been issued by the U.S. Government.
Furthermore, the U.N. Security Council was presented on February 8th with a resolution condemning the bombing on February 6th of the Russian trade mission in Syria’s capital of Damascus, and this condemnation was blocked by the U.S. and UK delegations, which said that there wasn’t enough “information” about the event to condemn it.
Russia and Syria say that the attack had been done by jihadists, “terrorists,” by a shell fired by armed groups who were deployed in the eastern Ghouta suburb of Damascus, as part of repeated attacks on the Russian Embassy in Damascus, but the U.S. and UK refused to condemn the attack, regardless. Consequently, the U.N. Security Council’s press office was blocked from issuing a statement to the press saying that the Council condemned the attack on the Russian facility in Damascus.
Not only is the U.S. trying to take over part of sovereign Syrian territory (using Al Qaeda and Kurdish forces as their boots-on-the-ground to do it), but the U.S. and its UK ally are, essentially, supporting Al Qaeda allied jihadists who shell the Russian trade mission in Damascus.
Though the U.S. Congress has not yet declared war against Syria and against Russia, the U.S. Executive branch, the Commander-in-Chief or President of the United States, has placed the U.S. Government at war against both Russia and Syria, and America’s allies are not expresssing disgust at this act by their ally, which violates not only the U.S. Constitution but international law.
Meet the new Adolf Hitler: Donald Trump. Is every other government headed by a Neville Chamberlain of today? If none condemn the U.S. Government, then isn’t it undeniable?
—————
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.
thus Article Why is U.S. not globally condemned for its military occupation of Syria?
that is all articles Why is U.S. not globally condemned for its military occupation of Syria? This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article Why is U.S. not globally condemned for its military occupation of Syria? with the link address https://forhealthforaction.blogspot.com/2018/02/why-is-us-not-globally-condemned-for.html
0 Response to "Why is U.S. not globally condemned for its military occupation of Syria?"
Post a Comment